|
1
-
Aims
When language teachers decide to exploit
the potentials of Information and Communication Technology, they
have to do this by inserting this practice into a more comprehensive
theoretical and methodological framework, which, in every moment and in
every step of their work, can make clear the didactic reasons and the
purposes of this choice.
"The Internet is a tool which has great
potential in the language classroom, but its effectiveness in practice
depends to a large extent on the way it is exploited by teachers and
students. Your general methodology is also important." (Windeatt, Hardisty
and Eastment 2000 p 8)
It has to be
kept in mind that language learning is already effectively promoted with
traditional materials if they are used inside well planned activities/lessons/units/modules that are designed with a precise
awareness of the students’ needs, their learning paths, and the
under-lying approaches. The
revolution that new media, such as multimedia computers and the Internet
in particular, can bring to English teaching is that they dramatically
enlarge the repertoire of educational tools, their possibilities, and
their combinations. They allow teachers and learners to extend their
access both to educational resources, and to resources in general that can
be used as educational materials, to make everything visible and so more
comprehensible, to help analyse and organise information, to get in touch
with different types of media, texts, styles, and registers, so improving
language understanding and producing. Finally they give to teachers and
students the possibility to communicate and to promote collaboration,
leading to the creation, production and publication of personalised and
original work.
This is the
new frontier that language teachers can explore and creatively exploit in
order to offer their students the possibility to use a new language to
learn and communicate; as English is the language of online communication,
they not only improve their command of the language but also use the
language to study subjects that they find interesting from the aspect of
the content.[1]
The following points should be the final
aims of introducing ICT in language teaching:
· to build a
learning environment in which teachers and learners can create contexts
for real communication inside and outside the
classroom;
· to present
the English language as a means to learn and communicate about content;
· to
transform the realism of the contexts created in class simulations into
reality;
· to break school
isolation;
· to establish new relationships between school and
society;
· to
establish new relationships between school and youth languages.
Computers are
introduced into language teaching as the
communicative tools which can make this possible.
“I think the
strongest way we can do that is by creating situations within schools
where children pursue with their own passion from their hearts. They
pursue projects that they're really interested in, they find out by
getting the information they need from the Internet. They work with one
another. They do something difficult. The teacher acts as a counsellor, as
a guide. So the teacher has to get used to the idea of respecting the
children as learners, of recognising that they create their own knowledge,
that the old ambition that many educators have had - that children can
learn by doing experientially in a way that's really meaningful for them -
can finally be realised. So, this is not about what technology does to
learning. It is about old well-established ideas of how we would like
children to learn and technology makes possible to make these dreams of
the past educators come true.”
(Seymour
Papert[2], Venice, 1997)
Top
of the page
2
- Role
of computer in relation to the different learning theories and
instruction models
There is a strict interconnection between use of
technologies, learning theories, and teaching models. The role of
computers in teaching has changed in time, following the development of
the theoretical models of the learning processes, and can be different
today in accordance with the learning theory and the method/s a teacher
practices. There are
three principal learning theories that are relevant to the use of advanced
technologies in teaching: Behaviourism,
Cognitivism
and Constructivism.
The tables below show the characteristics of these three theories, and
relate them to the models of instruction that consequently apply, and show
how computers can be used.
| LEARNING
THEORY[3] |
MODELS[4] OF
INSTRUCTION |
ROLE OF
COMPUTER |
ACTIVITIES
AND SOFTWARE |
|
BEHAVIOURISM[5]
concerned only in objectively observable
behaviours
knowledge
is considered as given and absolute (objective knowledge)
mental
activity (unobservable) is explained in terms of habit built up
through behavioural conditioning (stimulus-response-reinforcement):
behavioural patterns are repeated until they become
automatic
learners
adapt to the environment by responding to its demands; they are
passive in the knowledge construction process
the teacher's job consists in modifying the behaviour of the
learners by providing the learners with manageable chunks of
information, establishing objectives, and measuring the learner's
performance based on those objectives
|
direct
instruction
transmission
teaching
|
tutor
teaching
machine
|
programmed
instruction, tutorials, drills, exercises, authoring programs to
produce exercises and tests |
| LEARNING
THEORY |
MODELS
OF INSTRUCTION |
ROLE OF
COMPUTER |
ACTIVITIES
AND SOFTWARE |
|
COGNITIVISM[6]
more concerned in what goes
on inside the brain than in the external behaviours (learner's
mental processes during the learning process), in how information is
received, assimilated, stored, and retrieved
knowledge is stills viewed as given
and absolute (objective knowledge)
the knowledge construction process
is an active mental processing on the part of the learner, which can
have unpredictable results
the teacher provides the
"intellectual scaffolding" (cognitive and metacognitive
skills, strategies, competencies) by building on the learner's experience
and providing challenging tasks; establishes objectives and measures
the learner's performance according to those objectives
|
discovery
learning
task based learning
|
Cognitive tool
Personal tool
|
artificial intelligence,
programming languages, BASIC LOGO, etc.
application
programs, Word processor, graphic programs, simulation programs, etc.
|
| LEARNING
THEORY
|
MODELS
OF INSTRUCTION |
ROLE OF
COMPUTER |
ACTIVITIES
AND SOFTWARE |
|
CONSTRUCTIVISM[7]
learners
are active in the knowledge construction process
the
knowledge construction process is constantly affected by the
learner's previous experience/knowledge of the world; learning is a
personal interpretation of the world
knowledge
is constructed by the mediation and negotiation among learners
and teachers working together
the
teacher provides authentic tasks in meaningful contexts, real
situations, problem solving and case based activities, and not a
predetermined set of instructions, so encouraging reflection on
experience
|
cooperative learning
whole language
reading/writing workshop
situated learning
anchored instruction
authentic
instruction
|
means
of communication
cooperative
tool
|
Internet,
WWW, e-mail, chat, newsgroup, mailing list, video conference,
forum, discussion group, etc.
multimedia
communication, networks, hypertext/ hypermedia consulting and
building, crosscurricular projects, learning communities,
etc.
|
As it is possible to
see in this table, there has been a shift from the idea of teaching as
transmission of a given and absolute body of pre-determined knowledge,
considered as an objective corpus the learners have to acquire, to the
idea of teaching as process oriented, aiming at the acquisition of skills
and strategies that can make a student a lifelong learner. From
behaviourism to cognitivism, and constructivism the shift comes from the
centrality of the teacher to that of the students and their needs, from
the centrality of the information to be transmitted to that of the
processes through which learners acquire new knowledge. In a few words the
focus moves from what to teach and learn to how to teach by respecting the
mental paths of the learners. Constructivism,
in particular, “Rather
than seeing information as a thing that can be transmitted, sees students
as independent learners building and creating knowledge for themselves in
a learning environment designed to encourage and facilitate just
that……knowledge is always constructed by each student's efforts to make
sense of the world…..instruction means providing exploratory and
problem-solving situations that allow the student to experiment, to make
mistakes, and to work collaboratively with peers to find answers to
problems.
" (Willis
J W, Stephens E C & Matthew K, op cit p. 7)
What is the role of
technology in all this? It supports the choices that the teachers make at
every step of their work, by providing an easily accessible environment to
fulfil their teaching objectives.
Top
of the page
3
- Communication
technologies in learning vs Learning through communication
technologies
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING
When teachers decide to harness the power of
modern communications technology in order to deliver the curriculum in a
more “efficient” manner, without questioning the assumptions that are
incorporated into the curriculum, we can say that they are merely using
communications technology in teaching and learning. The only changes are
in the tools used. The philosophy that underlies the system survives
intact.
This is what usually
happens in our schools, when the teachers decide to update means and
materials to better fulfil their job by exploiting the incredible number
of opportunities offered by computers, and online technology in particular.
It is
"simply"
technology used by teachers and learners in their way towards language
improvement.
When the teachers
introduce computers and ICT into their usual activities, they add some
explicit values, in that they give them more
effectiveness, and obtain more involvement on the part of the students
because of the unlimited potentials of both hardware and software. The
learning activities are optimised and quickened by the exploitation of the
new technologies' capacities: immediate access to an enormous amount
of resources and information, the potential to carry out
interpersonal exchanges, and to establish an authentic contact with the
outside world. Beyond involvement and effectiveness, there is also
another explicit value, the most important for language teachers, which is
the undeniable improvement of language skills and strategies related
to handling information and the language through which it is conveyed in
the stages of searching, analysing and processing information. All this is
mixed together with other skills that represent another important
implicit additional value that the use of computers and ICT can
give the students: the simultaneous, natural and often incidental
acquisition of the IT skills, necessary to handle hardware and software in
order to fulfil tasks and solve problems[8].
Here is a list of some
skills and strategies involved in ICT-based language activities:
· technology
skills in the use of hardware and software
· navigation
skills (search, discrimination, skimming, scanning, evaluation of sources,
material, types of texts, style, information)
· choice
of suitable paths inside the hypertext/hypermedia in order to find the
desired results
· definition
of the characteristics of the information (origin, quality, relevance,
reliability)
· use
of search engines (planning the search, devising the possible key words,
choosing different types of search engines according to the purpose of the
search)
· use
of the information according the pre-determined objectives and
tasks
· use
of the written language as a means of communication (formal / informal) in
email and chat exchange
· use
of the oral language as a means of communication in
videoconferencing
· use
of the oral language as a means of communication while discussing,
reporting, negotiating and mediating inside the class with the teacher and
the other students
LEARNING THROUGH
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
In this case we think of
the new learning opportunities offered by the introduction of ICT in
education, in particular:
·
Distance education and
training
·
Autonomous
learning
·
Cooperative
learning with distant people and entities
These are the educational fields where ICT has done a sort
of revolution by imprinting a big push towards unexpected developments and
applications. These activities were almost impossible, or at least very
difficult to carry out and limited in number, before the
introduction of IT and telematics and can be considered the true
innovations in IT applied to education.
The choice of
introducing communication through IT in language teaching involves a
change in the way of searching and selecting language materials, building
activities, giving tasks, organizing work in class, planning projects,
stating objectives, collaborating with other teachers, schools and social
institutions.
It is not simply the
introduction of new powerful teaching aids in the usual routine in order
to allow students to obtain better results. It is a more complex process
that changes the perspective of both teachers and students in the way they
consider the language and what they can do with it.[9]
Teachers have to
reconsider:
- role of the
language
- role of the language
teacher[10]
- teaching
plans/syllabus design
- teaching
activities/learning tasks
- learning
environment
- rapport
(teacher/student, student/student, teacher/teacher)
- relationship between
schools
- relationship between
school and society
In conclusion it’s not
only a question of "using computers". Using computers at school is not an
approach at all, nor it is a new methodology, nor it is an innovation in
itself, as it is possible to use new tools even inside very traditional
frameworks. Technology can become a teaching aid and a teaching/learning
project catalyst only if the teachers previously re-define their
objectives, their idea of school and teaching, their teaching
methodologies.[11]
Top
of the page
4 - Producing
hypermedia and web pages as class projects
WHAT ARE HYPERTEXTS? WHAT ARE HYPERMEDIA?
Ted Nelson[12] wrote in
1965
his self-published Literary Machines: "By hypertext I
mean non-sequential writing - text that branches and allows choices to the
reader…..As popularly conceived, this is a series of text chunks connected
by links which offer the reader different pathways."
Nicholas Negroponte[13] wrote in
1996: “Hypermedia is an extension of hypertext, a term for highly
interconnected narrative, or linked information. The idea came from early
experiments at the Stanford Research Institute by Douglas Englebart and
derived its name from work at Brown University by Ted Nelson, circa 1965.
In a printed book, sentences, paragraphs, pages, and chapters follow one
another in an order determined not only by the author but also by the
physical and sequential construct of the book itself. While a book may be
randomly accessible and your eyes may browse quite haphazardly, it is
nonetheless forever fixed by the confines of three physical dimensions.
In
the digital world, this is not the case. Information space is by no means
limited to three dimensions. An expression of an idea or train of thought
can include a multidimensional network of pointers to further elaborations
or arguments, which can be invoked or ignored. The structure of the text
should be imagined like a complex molecular model. Chunks of information
can be reordered, sentences expanded, and words given definitions on the
spot…... These linkages can be embedded either by the author at "publishing" time or later by readers over time. Interaction is implicit
in all multimedia.” (Nicholas
Negroponte 1995, Cyberdock version of Being Digital, http://archives.obs-us.com/obs/english/books/nn/)
BUILDING HYPERTEXTS AT SCHOOL
Making a hypertext as a class project means to affect all of
the three main components of the teaching-learning process, cognitive,
metacognitive, affective, because it is a complex work, made up of
different phases and activities which improve language, cognitive,
and metacognitive skills, give the students a greater degree of
autonomy, present the foreign language as a communicative tool, enhance
the motivation of the students, foster their capacity of cooperating.
The main purpose of the
project is related explicitly to the improvement of the students'
knowledge of a content by means of a comprehensive exploration of the
topics chosen by the class through the search, the analysis and the
comparison of materials coming from different sources (books,
encyclopaedias, WWW, CDROMs, etc.).
The
second, and not less important, purpose is related to the development of all the different
skills and competencies necessary for the production of the final work,
the hypertext/hypermedia, which is assumed to be the "physical"
representation of the collaborative work of both the individuals (students
and teacher) and the groups involved in the project.
In particular a project
work aiming at the production of a hypertext develops:
·
knowledge of both
content and language
·
cognitive skills, both
linguistic and logic
·
metacognitive
awareness
·
IT
skills
·
learner’s autonomy
·
affective component
Finally it changes completely the role of the teacher (no
more "transmitter, but coordinator, mediator, activator, etc.). The
teacher is one of the group, sometimes learner of his/her students.
OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT
Content
· acquisition of plenty of new information about the topics
chosen
· choice of some aspects
of the content matter
according their relevance and/or the students’ interest
· establishment of all the
possible relations between the information collected
Language and logic skills
· reinforcement of
linguistic competence and development of personal vocabulary
· enhancement of skimming,
scanning, discriminating (reading)
· development of classroom
language/conversational/social English (listening/speaking) during the
group or class discussions/reports, etc
· improvement of the
capacity of taking notes while reading or while listening/viewing
· discriminating and
comparing information and sources
· mind mapping
· production of summaries
(writing) or oral reports (speaking) to be presented to the group or to
the class
· improvement of the
capacity of producing personal schemes, layouts, graphic representations
which synthetically illustrate the main ideas and the information found
and that are the bases of the personal production of the
texts
· reorganising materials
in nodes[14],
establishing links between them, after deciding the type of logical
relation between the information collected
Affective
component
· development of the
capacity of negotiating and mediating in order to decide what to do (mind mapping, page planning, project time
schedule, individual or
group tasks, deadlines, etc.)
· development of personal/group responsibilities in carrying out a common work
· development of a sense
of self-confidence and self-esteem in doing a work which has a precise
and concrete purpose, that is the realisation of a common final
communicative product
· acquisition of the
awareness that English is a means for acquiring or reporting information,
that is to say a language for learning, a vehicle for
communicating
· development of a
cooperative work: student-student, student-teacher, teacher-teacher,
school-external reality, in the research phase, in the production
stage, and in the stage of the final presentation of the
product
Metacognitive awareness
· acquisition of
metacognitive awareness through the analysis of one’s own method
effectiveness
· awareness of what is being done and its purpose
· development of
one's own autonomy and self-managing in planning the
work, searching for sources, analysing comparing , and choosing
them
IT
skills
· acquisition of the basic
technical skills in using the necessary hardware and software (knowledge
of the necessary functions of the operating system for creating and
handling folders and files, use of a word processor, graphic and sound
acquisition/processing software, a hypertext/web page authoring
software)
· mastery of the use of
the browser and the search engines while navigating through the Internet
· use of email and chat
for getting in touch with people and entities outside the
school
LINGUISTIC AND
TECHNICAL PRE-REQUISITES
The students should have an adequate linguistic competence
that allows them to read and comprehend the texts, report their content
both orally and in written form.
It is assumed that students are
already able to skim and scan a text, find the relevant information
and organise coherent and cohesive oral/written production.
As
to the content, it would be better that the students have already some
general knowledge of the content, so that they can easily skim through the
materials they find and discriminate what is useful to them and what is
not. The production of the hypertext is intended as a way to deepen the
knowledge of the aspects they like most.
From the technical point
of view, the students should be able to use the main commands of the
operating system and the main functions of an authoring software for
creating hypertexts, better if in HTML language so that the product can be
published on the Web . In addition they should be familiar with the
Internet navigation. Anyway every project may be carried out in
collaboration with a teacher who is competent in Information Technology,
and the student can acquire the necessary skills in technology while
working, as often happens in real life.
A MAJOR POINT: USING AUTHENTIC MATERIAL
One of the major aspects of carrying out a project like this
is the continuous and massive exposure of the learners to authentic
language, and consequently the use of linguistic material which is not
graded or adapted to the students’ levels because it is not intentionally
devised for learning purposes. The advantages of this decision can easily
be seen in that the learners are immediately in touch with real language,
both oral and written, without any contrived mediation in terms of lexical
range, structures, complexity and variety of texts. The disadvantages are
in the possible students’ linguistic inadequacy in managing such
materials. The key is in the perspective from which we face the problem,
which is not in grading and adapting the material to the level of
linguistic proficiency of the students, which would result in excessive
simplification both of the language and inevitably of the content. The
right perspective is in grading and adapting the tasks and the activities
through which the content is presented, comprehended, manipulated,
processed. The content and the tasks, not the language, must be at the
level of the students, but never too simple; otherwise there will be no
new learning and the material will appear too banal and not motivating in
the eyes of the students, only an elementary repetition of what is already
known, not challenging or intriguing from the cultural and cognitive point
of views.
METHODOLOGY
In the different phases of the project different types of
procedures are used:
·
plenary sessions\discussions
·
individual work
·
group work
·
individual and group research in class
·
autonomous work
MAIN STEPS IN
DEVELOPING A HYPERTEXT
· choice of the topic with
the class and other teacher/s if it is an interdisciplinary
work
· construction of a mind
map which helps generate ideas for associations and helps organise
information
·
search /discussion/process/creation of
materials/documents related to the aspects
chosen (individually or in groups)
· plan of each page/node
to be created and production of the texts, choice and processing of the
images, sounds, animations etc. to put in them
· location of all the
possible links that represent the interconnections among the pages/nodes
produced
· work at the computer
individually or in small groups for making files and building up the
hypertext, by using different types of software (word processor, graphics
software, hypertext authoring, etc.).
· presentation of the
final product
TESTING AND ASSESSMENT
Testing and assessment will have the double purpose of
measuring both the level of language learning and the mastery of the
content.
At the end of the analysis of the materials taken from the
different sources, the groups will report orally about the information and
the sources they have found . The purpose will be the assessment of the
oral production, the quantity/quality of the content, and, consequently,
the suitability and effectiveness of the materials collected.
At
the end of the phase concerning the production of the texts, the students
will be assessed in their capacity of summarising, re-elaborating and
making coherent and linguistically correct written texts.
At the
end of the project the groups will present the final product in public and
the students will be assessed according to a list of parameters and
descriptors of level specifically devised for the type of communication
chosen, the hypertext, so not only related to the individual linguistic
competence. Some of the parameters could be graphic interface,
navigability, logic organisation, presentation skills, etc.
The
capacity to co-operate in order to fulfil a common objective will be
assessed by observing the communicative interaction among the students and
between students and teachers. A form will be used on which the teacher
will take systematic notes on the behaviour of the students (especially
during group work) and on the results of the autonomous work, on the
respect of the deadlines and task fulfilment.
Top
of the page
5
- Interpersonal
exchange projects by using email
The
advantages of email are many and so evident that they can appear even
obvious.
- Speed,
and possibility to keep constantly in touch with the partners, with
immediate updating and consequent high level of motivation and
involvement.
- Availability
of partner schools and teachers, often online with their Web sites, who
are very motivated in starting and carrying out the exchanges, thanks to
special Web sites which offer their databases both to search for
partners or to insert our school's profile.
- Possibility
to send and receive any types of files containing documents, images,
sounds, etc., attached to the written messages (download time
permitting), which makes communication various, complete and more
similar to a real contact made up of both visual and sound perceptions
and allows exchanges more in depth than by an ordinary letter.
- Natural
tendency to use a language which id very similar to the spoken
communication, given the exchange speed and frequency, which makes the
communicative exchanges more like a conversation developing in time than
a form of written communication, whose nature is more formal, coherent
and "compact". The more frequent the messages are and the familiarity
and the acquaintance with the interlocutors become stronger , the more
the tendency will be to write just like we speak. The formality of the
written communication usually stays only in the documents attached,
concerning researches, projects, work in general created according to
the features and the text typologies of the written communication.
- Low
cost of the activity, only the cost of the telephone call when you get
connected to the Internet.
- Extreme
flexibility and complete freedom to manage this kind of activity, which
is constantly carried out by negotiating its possible developments with
our students and the partner schools.
- Possibility
to perform both "simple" exchange of information, and more complex and
challenging collaborative projects with other schools without following
the long and complicated paths (forms to fill in, authorisations of
committees and school authorities, managing of complex budgets, official
planning and reports….) of the "canonical" European projects. These
offer more opportunities in terms of funding, of course, but do not make
a poor teacher feel like getting involved in them because of the
complicated procedures they require.
The
cooperative projects with foreign partners which it is possible to carry
out via email are a bright example of new technologies of communication
applied to English language teaching. Online communication is an ideal
support to the communicative approach, which is based on the equation
"language = communication", on the analysis of the learners' language and
communicative needs, on the meaningfulness and the precise individuation
of the communicative aims of the language activities.
It
is true that an effective methodology and the stimulus of the intrinsic
motivation (coming from the didactic mediation and connected to the
rapport between teacher and students) can make the classroom simulations
effective, and the good teachers of foreign languages have been doing this
for years. But now, new technologies and the Internet in particular, are
able to optimise and emphasise the communicative approach's results, by
giving teachers and students unprecedented opportunities with respect to
any other kinds of teaching aids.
The
only problem, but at the same time also the most challenging aspect, is in
that this kind of activities are absolutely unpredictable and risk taking.
You know how they start, but you never know how they will develop and
where they will carry you. But this is also the beauty of the experience,
since unpredictability,
speed, and extreme flexibility make it very motivating and
meaningful to the learners. Unfortunately this is often in contrast with
the extreme stationary and slowness of the school environment both from
the organisation and administrative point of view (laboratories managing
and servicing, authority recognition and distribution, subdivision of
functions, timetables, lab reservations, and things like that), and from
the methodological and didactic point of view, since this kind of projects
are often considered a sort of "edging" activities, a surplus with respect
to the "serious" things to teach. I mean that often these activities are
not organically part of the curriculum replacing other activities which
experience has showed as completely ineffective, or even harmful, if we
consider the level of language knowledge of our students at the end of the
high school!!!
Another consideration: this kind of
activity, because of its high level of unpredictability, high speed of development and the way it brings the
teachers into play, often forces the teachers to face topics which are as
new to them as they are to their students, and so completely changes their
role: they become co-ordinators, guides, tutors, and, at
the same time, a great work of continuous planning is required, changes of
direction deriving from the mediation with the partners and the feedback coming from the students.
Otherwise everything is over after the first "Hi, My name is Maria, I am
15 years old, I live in….. My hobbies are…..I like……, etc.". And I find it
really tiring, but….very, very challenging and creative.
Paradoxically virtual communication gives the
English language teachers the possibility to make real the communicative
exchanges with native speakers and with speakers of other languages
through a common vehicular code. In the usual class simulations (role
plays, information gap activities, etc.) communication is only realistic,
that is similar to reality, but not felt by the students as real. They are simply didactic
activities where the language is only a school subject, with all the
negative connotation this conveys (school = false environment = not
connected to the real world).
Top
of the page
6 - Conclusion
I
do not want to say that everything in ELT can be done by means of
communicative activities supported by online technology. I only mean that
the introduction of a relationship with "pieces" of real life through the
computer and by using a
foreign language, can become a meaningful and stimulating aim and partly
replace the extrinsic, instrumental motivation, very often absent in our
students. If the learners are given the possibility to use the foreign
language in real communication activities by using English, even the other
class activities which are more “school-like”, will have a different
meaning for them. They will appear a useful training, a sort of necessary
gymnastics to reinforce skills and acquire new language knowledge they can
profitably transfer in the performance stage, since they need them to
communicate in real exchanges with someone who can understand them only by
using the language they are learning.
In
a word they can become “just-in-time” direct instruction activities,
recognised as necessary and useful by the students because situated in a
moment of real need and anchored to meaningful and challenging projects.
References
Dorin H, Demmin P, E (1992) Gabel D, Chemistry: The Study of
Matter, Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Jarvis H, A (July 1998) A role for Information Technology in the
EFL classroom, CALL
Review, IATEFL
Kommers P, A, M, Grabinger S & Dunlap J,C (1996) Hypermedia Learning
Environments, LEA, Mahwah, NJ
Negroponte N, Cyberdock version of Being Digital (1995)
http://archives.obs-us.com/obs/english/books/nn/
Papert S, interview,
“Learning with computer” (1997)
http://www.mediamente.rai.it/mmold/english/bibliote/intervis/p/papert.htm
Willis J, W, Stephens E, C & Matthew K, I (1996) Technology,
Reading, and Language Arts, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights,
Massachusetts
Windeatt S, Hardisty D & Eastment D (2000) The Internet,
OUP
English made in Brazil (n.d.) Retrieved December 15, 2000, from the
World Wide Web: (http://www.viavale.com.br/english/sk.html#menu
Funderstanding (1998). Retrieved December 15, 2000, from the World
Wide Web: http://www.funderstanding.com/index.html
Keep C, McLaughlin T & Parmar R, The Electronic
Labyrinth. Retrieved December 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/elab/elab.html
MediaMente (2000). Retrieved December 15, 2000, from the World Wide
Web: http://www.mediamente.rai.it/mediamentetv/learning/index.asp
Mergel B (1998) Instructional Design & Learning Theory.
Retrieved December 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.htm
Pittarese T (1999) Cognitivism.
Retrieved November 15,
2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pittarese.com/lt/cognitivism.htm
The University of British Columbia (2000). Retrieved December 10,
2000, from the World Wide Web: http://itesm.cstudies.ubc.ca/561g/canada/main.html
Background reading
Brinton D, M, Snow M, A & Bingham Wesche M (1989) Content
-Based Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House, New York
Calvani A & Rotta M (1999)
Comunicazione e apprendimento in Internet, Erickson, Trento
Forsyth
I, ( 1996) Teaching and Learning Materials and the Internet, Kogan
Page, London
Fried-Booth D, L (1986) Project Work, OUP
Gold L & Zielinski J, M (2000) Homeschool Your Child For
Free, Prima Publishing, Roseville, California
Greenwood J, "The role of English in interdisciplinary teaching",
Creativity in Language Teaching, The British Council 1988, Milan
Conference
Little D, Devitt S
& Singleton D (1989) Learning Foreign Languages from Authentic
Texts: Theory and Practice, Authentik in association with CILT,
Dublin
Schweizer
H, ( 1999) Designing and Teaching an On-line Course, Allyn and
Bacon, Neddham Heights,Massachusetts
Snow M, A, Brinton D, M (1997) Content-Based Classroom,
Longman, New York
Stryker S, B, Leaver B, L (1997) Content-Based Instruction in
Foreign Language Education, Georgetown University Press, Washington
Trentin G (1996) Didattica in rete.
Internet, telematica e cooperazione educativa, Garamond, Roma
Widdowson H, G (1978) Teaching Language as Communication,
OUP
Top
of the page
Home Daniela
Home
Cannizzaro
|