Pirandello's Theatre

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction:

 

The importance of Pirandello in the history of world theatre is undeniable. Although he wrote most of his plays in the beginning of the last century, they are still successfully performed and not only in Italy.   

Pirandello’s theatre reflects what Pirandello’s literary production deals with. The main themes of Pirandello’s theatre are noticeable in most of Pirandello’s novels and short stories (see “Main themes of “Quando si comprende” by Luca Forte) so much that  some short stories became theatre plays( like "Pensaci Giacomino" and "Così è se vi pare").

Only after 1916 Pirandello’s main activity became theatre; we can say that Pirandello began to write intensively theatre plays when he realized it was the best way to express the difficulties of living in a reality that every individual feels in a different way. According to Pirandello, art is reflection and its best expression is humour (see "Pirandello's Humour") ; theatre naturally represents the conflict of opinions through which all the false myths collapse.

 

 

Periodisation:

 

Pirandello’s theatrical production is divisible in three parts: approximately from 1909 to 1916 he wrote principally comedies mostly in Sicilian dialect, set in the island, like “Lùmie di Sicilia”, “Liolà”, “La Patente”. Then he created what we actually consider his masterpieces. “Cosi è, se vi pare”, ”Il piacere dell’onestà”, “Sei personaggi in cerca d’autore”, “Enrco IV” all belong to this artistic period, and all reflect the Pirandellian conception of life.

In his last drama productions he uses fantasy and wonder like he never did before to create modern myths with positive idealities.

In this essay we are going to focus on Pirandello’s masterpieces.

 

 

Right you are (Così è, se vi pare - 1917)

 

 

 

One of the most developed Pirandellian themes is the background assumption of this comedy: nobody will ever have a unique and unquestionable vision of reality. Nobody has got an a priori essence and every man becomes a person just as a consequence of other people’s opinions. Every man is as he is depicted by the others, and that is why every man can be as many different masks as the people he gets in touch with.

 

Berretto a sonagli(1917)

 

 

 

This comedy is a story of infidelity and scandal, one of the best examples of Italian theatre. In this play every character is a “puppet” and has got his own personality to show to everybody. It’s a question of "look". Everybody wants “its own puppet” to be respected, though they are aware they do not deserve this respect. This is the core of the famous speech of Ciampa in the fourth act of the comedy. It is one of the most popular plays of Pirandello.

 

 

Pleasure Of Honesty (Il Piacere dell'onestà - 1917)

 

In this comedy Pirandello starts from an apparently insignificant story (a man has to find a husband for his lover that is pregnant to give a name to the child she is expecting. An impoverished aristocrat because of his gambling debts, Baldovino, is chosen for the purpose), then he enlarges it and reaches the tragedy. It is a play about men’s impossibility to live their lives by following abstract concepts. Baldovino accepts the marriage for the pleasure of representing honesty, but then brings his righteous behaviour to extreme consequences. In the end of the play his feelings revolt against all that and he gets his life back .

 

 

Six characters in search of an author (Sei personaggi in cerca d'autore - 1921)

 

This comedy is, for (almost) unanimous judgment from the literary critics, his masterpiece, and perhaps one of the best plays of the Italian theatre of 20th century. In this work the author, using the “theatre in the theatre” trick gives a complex and successful representation of the human condition and of the way he meant the relationship between playwright and actors. The six characters ask the lead-actor to be drawn from their condition - they have been only half-created by the author- to see their tragedy performed and then they don’t recognize themselves in the actors that try to play it: they are an exceptional reading key of the whole Pirandellian theatre. 

 

 

Henry IV (Enrico IV - 1922)       

 

The protagonist of this drama is a young aristocrat that during a masquerade, disguised as Henry IV, after a horse accident he hits his head and gets crazy. For twelve years, he lives pretending to be Henry IV. But, after a long time, suddenly he retrieves the reason he had lost and he realizes what has happened in his period of craziness: life had gone on and he had been excluded from it, so he chooses to keep to live as an historical character protected from the case.  

 

 

 

Conclusions

 

Trying to extrapolate what is the final meaning of Pirandello's theatre, we can’t avoid to mention his own declarations. Pirandello began writing for the theatre with a deep moral conviction: a play is an effective instrument the writer uses to reveal to men the “awful truth” he painfully gets to. So everyone getting in contact with his theatre (be it an actor, a spectator or a reader) watches himself with curiosity very often deformed and full of greatly enlarged faults. That’s the main purpose of Pirandello in his theatre. So we can understand that his plays are universally comprehensible, because every man has got the same existential problems. So comprehensible that some critics believe that it was only through Pirandello’s playwright activity that his art, and the whole Italian modern literature, successfully became European and “global”. 

 

 

Limits

 

However the critics found some limits in Pirandello’s literature (and in his theatre, of course); these limits are intrinsic, inseparable from his literary production: sometimes his works are really made up of this matter.

The characteristics most usually considered objectionable are mainly his so called “cerebralism”, the ruthless distruction of every confidence, the unilaterality of his conception and his pedagogic style. Despite all, he was (and he is still) admired for his capacity to universally interpret the anxiety every modern man has.

 

by Giacomo Cirillo, Lorenzo Sbrighi, and Francesco Fraiegari